k
As organizations adopt Kubernetes for large-scale applications, multitenancy becomes a critical concern. This article explores different approaches to making a Kubernetes cluster multitenant while ensuring proper tenant isolation.
Why Multitenancy in Kubernetes?
Multitenancy allows multiple teams or applications to share a Kubernetes cluster while maintaining:
- Security: Preventing unauthorized access between tenants.
- Resource Efficiency: Maximizing infrastructure usage.
- Operational Simplicity: Managing fewer clusters while maintaining isolation.
Kubernetes does not provide built-in multitenancy features, so implementing isolation requires a combination of namespaces, RBAC, network policies, and resource constraints.
Types of Multitenancy Approaches
1. Logical Isolation (Soft Multitenancy)
Logical isolation is achieved within a shared cluster using namespaces, RBAC, and policies.
a) Namespace-Based Isolation
Each tenant gets a dedicated namespace, restricting workloads to that namespace.
1 | apiVersion: v1 |
- Use RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) to restrict access:
1 | apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 |
1 | apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 |
b) Network Isolation
By default, all pods in a cluster can communicate with each other. To isolate tenants:
- Use Network Policies to limit communication.
- Example: Deny all ingress and egress traffic.
1 | apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 |
c) Resource Quotas & Limits
Prevent tenants from consuming excessive resources.
1 | apiVersion: v1 |
d) Pod Security Admission
- Enforce security rules (e.g., no privileged containers, running as non-root).
- Replace deprecated PodSecurityPolicy with Pod Security Admission in Kubernetes 1.23+.
2. Hard Isolation (Strong Multitenancy)
For stronger security, tenants should have dedicated infrastructure or virtual clusters.
a) Dedicated Node Pools (Taints & Tolerations)
- Assign specific nodes to tenants.
- Use taints & tolerations to ensure workloads are scheduled only on designated nodes.
1 | kubectl taint nodes node1 tenant=tenant1:NoSchedule |
1 | tolerations: |
b) Virtual Clusters (vCluster)
Loft Labs’ vCluster allows running isolated virtual clusters inside a physical cluster.
1 | vcluster create tenant1 --namespace tenant1 |
Each tenant gets:
- A separate Kubernetes API server.
- Full control over resources.
- Stronger isolation than namespace-based multitenancy.
c) Separate Kubernetes Clusters
For maximum security, each tenant can get its own Kubernetes cluster.
- Managed via Cluster API or Kubernetes Federation.
- Higher cost, but ensures strict tenant isolation.
3. Comparing Multitenancy Approaches
| Approach | Cost | Security Isolation | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Namespace-Based | Low | Medium | Simple |
| Virtual Clusters | Medium | High | Moderate |
| Dedicated Nodes | Medium | High | Complex |
| Separate Clusters | High | Strong | Complex |
Recommendation:
- Use namespaces + RBAC for lightweight multitenancy.
- Use vClusters for stronger isolation while sharing infrastructure.
- Use dedicated clusters for maximum security.
4. Final Thoughts
Multitenancy in Kubernetes requires a combination of security, access control, and resource isolation. The right approach depends on your needs:
- Small teams: Namespace-based multitenancy is sufficient.
- Enterprise: Virtual clusters or node isolation offer better control.
- Highly regulated environments: Dedicated clusters ensure compliance.
By implementing the right strategy, Kubernetes can support multi-tenant workloads efficiently while maintaining security and performance.